Recently, Keung To has faced public scrutiny after discrepancies between his social media photos and real-life appearance led netizens to nickname him “P-To” and “Fat-To.” The controversy sparked debates over idol image management and photo editing. Mainstream media outlets such as HK01, Oriental Daily, and Ming Pao reported on the issue, highlighting visible signs of photo retouching and the stark contrast with his actual physique.

While some fans criticized the media for focusing too much on appearance, others questioned whether idols should present a more authentic image. The incident triggered widespread discussion on “idol personas,” “image packaging,” and “authenticity” in the entertainment industry.

This prediction market aims to determine whether, before 11:59 PM on December 31, 2025, Keung To will be explicitly described in mainstream media reports as an idol with excessive image management—using terms such as “over-managed image,” “photo-editing controversy figure,” or “persona collapse.”

✅ If “Yes” is chosen: It means that by the specified time, mainstream media (e.g., HK01, Ming Pao, Oriental Daily, TOPick) has used any of the following terms to describe Keung To:

“Over-managed image”
“Photo-editing controversy figure”
“Persona collapse”
“P-To / Fat-To controversy continues”
Or other clearly evaluative phrases pointing to a gap between image and reality

❌ If “No” is chosen: It means that by the specified time, mainstream media has not used any of the above or similar terms to define Keung To, and coverage remains descriptive or focused on fan reactions without explicit editorial judgment.

📌 Determination Criteria:

Reports from Hong Kong mainstream media (HK01, Ming Pao, Oriental Daily, TOPick, am730)
Headlines, article content, and commentary sections are all valid sources
Social media posts and fan comments are excluded from consideration